Find a DWI DUI Drunk Driving Lawyer in your state.

Search for Texas DWI Attorneys by County.

Fort Worth DWI Lawyers

• Clemente De La Cruz: Some Tarrant County police departments have begun using search warrants, in some cases, to obtain blood to test suspected drunken drivers who refuse to take a breath test.
• David Slaone:

  What to Do if Stopped for DWI

  Most people arrested for DWI in the Fort Worth area play right into the arresting officer’s hands when stopped. They do so by being cooperative and giving the officer all kinds of evidence to convict them and suspend their driver’s license that the officer would not have otherwise had. The most common and damaging mistakes include submitting to a variety of coordination tests and answering a variety of damming questions while believing if they’re cooperative with the officer the officer might let them go. Not so! By the time an officer asks a driver to step from their car for sobriety testing their belief is that the person is likely impaired and their intent is to take them to jail. If a driver is the least bit impaired they’re not going to “pass” these tests. These tests are designed for failure. The best thing to do is simply refuse to submit to all testing and refuse to answer any questions until an attorney is present. Remember, these police encounters are likely being videotaped with audio and video recordings (via a dash mounted camera in the patrol car and wireless microphone concealed on the officer.) So the best thing to do is say as little as possible, do as little as possible, and to be as polite as possible. Yes, they’re probably going to jail, but they were going to jail anyway! Better to beat the rap overall than to loose it badly by making a foolish attempt trying to beat the ride. By submitting to testing the driver gives the officer all kinds of things to talk about when he gets on the stand, which in turn, gives them the ability to make someone appear to be much more impaired than they actually were. By reading this, one should conclude the deck is clearly stacked against them if they have had ANYTHING containing alcohol to drink and are stopped for suspicion of DWI. People arrested for DWI, DUI and DUID in the Fort Worth area need to retain an experienced criminal trial attorney immediately. Pleadings to preserve their driving privilege need to be filed within 15 days of their arrest.

  Field Sobriety Testing

  “Failing” a field sobriety tests is much easier than one thinks! Indeed, most sober people cannot “pass” these tests. The results are very subjective and have little to do with whether someone can “complete” the tests. The officer is not looking for that. He or she is looking for “clues” of impairment rather than trying to see if the person can complete the test. There are basically three tests officers in the Dallas and Fort Worth area use:

  Nystagmus Gaze Test:

  This is where the officer asks a driver suspected of driving while impaired to hold their head still and follow the movement of an object (usually a pen) with their eyes as they move it both horizontally and vertically across the driver’s field of vision. What they’re looking for is a jerking movement in the eyes, which occurs in everyone after consuming any amount of alcohol, as well as other reasons. They look for jerking when the eye follows the object, or is angled at 45 degrees. This jerking will also occur if the tests are performed too long by fatiguing the muscles that control the eye. The jerking that occurs in the eyes when fatigued is no different than the jerking that occurs with other muscles in the body when tired or strained. So even if Nystagmus is not apparent when an officer first begins the tests, if he or she does it long enough, Nystagmus will occur. Additionally, anyone who has had anything to drink at all will usually demonstrate all clues in this test. Conducted long enough, those who haven’t been drinking at all will demonstrate the same clues. Rarely does an officer who has conducted a Nystagmus test say there weren’t “clues.” Anyone who agrees to take this test for an officer should plan on failing it.

  One Leg Stand:

  Few people sober or not, can perform these tests without practice without showing “clues” of intoxication. In these tests, an officer will ask the driver to lift one foot off the ground at least six inches, for 30 seconds. They’re to do this while looking down at their toe, and counting out loud, one-one thousand, two-one thousand, three-one thousand, and so on. By having the driver perform these two tasks at once, it splits their attention, making both much more difficult. Even if the driver is able to perform this tasks, they’ll likely fail the tests, because in this test the “clues” the officer is looking for are very subtle and includes swaying; using arms to balance, (or even slightly moving the hands or arms) loosing count, or putting the foot down and picking it back up during the tests (even though during instructions the officer implies that is okay.) Most people without practice cannot perform these tasks as perfectly as expected without having anything to drink, let alone with a few beers on board. The problem can be worse if the person is overweight, has inner ear problems or has problems with their feet or legs. This test is only supposed to be performed for 30 seconds. More and more officers are ignoring their training and requiring the tests be performed for longer periods till the driver eventually becomes fatigued and messes up. The driver has just failed that one! Rarely does anyone take this test without the officer noting at least two or three “clues.”

  Walk and Turn:

  Few people sober or not, can perform these tests without practice without showing “clues” of intoxication. In this test, the officer will ask a driver while looking down and his arms at his side to take nine heel-to-toe steps in a straight line, turn using a series of small steps, and take nine heel-to-toe steps back to the starting point. During instructions for this test the officer will ask the driver to stand with his heel to toe, and arms down at his side while facing the camera. The “clues” they arelooking for actually begin while they’re giving instructions, so the test actually begins long before the driver believes. The “clues” in this test include again swaying or moving or using the arms to balance. Other clues include beginning the tests before the officer says; not clearly touching heel to toe with each step; turning without using a series of small steps (which nearly everyone messes up); not counting out loud, etc. Again, without practice this is difficult for someone who hasn’t been drinking to do as perfectly as is required not to demonstrate “clues” of intoxication.

  After reading this, one should reasonable conclude it’s just best not to play a game they cannot win. Any of these “clues” coupled with a smell of alcohol is about all that’s needed for a jury to convict someone of DWI. People arrested for DWI, DUI and DUID need to retain an experienced criminal trial attorney who is aware of and can effectively educate a jury and expose these ploys used by the police to make someone appear much more impaired than they actually are.

  Breath and Blood Test:

  Breath testing devices employed by the police are inherently inaccurate. Even their manufacturers will not guarantee their accuracy. They all operate on the flawed assumptions that all people metabolize at the same rate(and release through their breath) the alcohol they have consumed. If everyone had identical metabolisms; eaten the same thing; drank the same thing, and the tests were administered identically, perhaps this device could give an accurate measurement of someone’s blood alcohol. It cannot. Also, few safeguards are taken to insure the sample is not contaminated by residual alcohol found in the throat or esophagus of the accused at the time these test are administered. A subtle hiccup or burp that goes unnoticed by the accused can produce artificially high tests results. A breath alcohol reading above .08 in Texas is ALL that is required to convict a driver of drunk driving, no matter how sober they appear outwardly. Most drivers correctly refuse to submit to any breath testing due to the inaccuracy of these tests and the devastating stigma that would form in the minds of a jury with an artificially high result. Blood testing, produces a much more accurate result. But the results are typically higher than those obtained by a non-contaminated breath test. Anyone who believes they may have had more than few drinks or beers should refuse to participate in all chemical testing. A driver has the absolute right to refuse to submit too breath of blood testing. There can be circumstances where the police are allowed to take a blood sample without a driver’s consent. However, this consent should never be given by a driver who has been drinking.

  WAYS TO AVOID DWI:

  Clearly, the deck is stacked against a driver who has a few beers on board. The best time to plan for being stopped is in the beginning of the evening, and not when a driver sees those lights in their rear-view mirror.

  • Staying home to drink, designating a driver, or eagerly surrendering the keys to someone else if they’re offering to drive is by far the safest way to avoid a DWI.

  • If a driver is alone, and after an evening out doesn’t feel safe to drive, they should call someone to come get them, or without placing the keys in the ignition sleep a few hours before attempting to drive. If the police find them asleep in their car they may still arrest them for public intoxication, but that’s far better than a DWI. Again, they should not put the keys in the ignition! The law prohibits operating a motor vehicle while impaired. Starting the car, running the heater or air conditioning and playing the radio have been considered “operating” the vehicle by some courts.

  • Frequent partiers should just leave a gym bag in their car containing essential toiletries and a change of clothes. That way they’re prepared to stay wherever they are when their lifestyle has rendered them unsafe to drive. They should make a habit of just staying put. There are a few unlucky ones that get caught their first time, but the vast majority of people accused of DWI, DUI or DUID are those who routinely drive after consuming intoxicants.

  • If someone drinking knows they’re going to have to drive, they should develop an accounting method that is simple to keep up with how much they’ve had to drink. It is very easy for someone to loose count on the number of alcoholic beverages they have had over the evening. For most, a token system works best. They should decide on a token to collect with each drink, and stick it in their pocket. Some ways to gather token includes collecting a match book every time they go to the bar, or licking the stir stick clean from each drink they’ve had and sticking it in their pocket. Or for beer, doing the same thing with the tab easily broken off the beer can, etc. At the end of the evening they can count their tokens and determine exactly how many drinks they have had, and from that make a more informed decision whether they should be driving; and what to do if they are stopped. (NOTE: They should NOT keep paper bar tabs or receipts in their car or on their person as an accounting method, especially if they have been buying drinks for others. The police often zealously search for these documents in drunken driving arrests and give them to prosecutors to use as evidence!) For the average person it takes four beers, glasses of wine, or single-shot mixed drinks to bring them to the legal blood-alcohol limit. If their accounting yields they have 4 or more alcoholic beverages they would be wise not to drive. If they do and get stopped, they would be wise NOT to submit to ANY sobriety testing. They should politely refuse and request an attorney before answering any questions.

  • Most police officers will try to tell a driver they are not entitled to have an attorney before answering questions of deciding whether or not to submit to testing when stopped for suspected DWI. Every citizen needs to understand they have an absolute right not to answer police questions if they are being detained. Also many police officers will tell a driver they will be arrested if they do not perform sobriety tests. What they don’t tell them at this point is they are probably getting arrested regardless. Every driver has an absolute right to refuse to participate in ALL sobriety testing. At trial, the burden will be on the state to prove the person was impaired. It is not up to the person accused to prove they weren’t. The driver who has been drinking who takes these tests will likely loose the rap and endure high fines, driver’s license suspensions, and perhaps a jail term trying to beat the ride and minor inconvenience of being arrested and having to bond out of jail.

  • Also parents should also take a realistic approach when imposing rules on their teen drivers. Many teenagers have landed in jail or the morgue by driving when they shouldn’t have been, and/or faster than they should have been for fear of missing a curfew. Most parents don’t want their kids out drinking, but kids make mistakes. Parents should open a dialogue on the topic of drinking and driving, and structure the rules so that a youthful inebriated driver is not forced onto the highway just to avoid certain punishment over a curfew. They need to understand that a late night call with an honest disclosure from their teen that is reluctant to drive is highly preferred over that call from jail; or knock at the door by a police officer or medical examiner.

  SEARCH WARRANTS:

  The latest craze in Fort Worth is for the police to procure a search warrant to compel blood testing of someone arrested for DWI. In this case a judge orders an officer to search an accused for evidence of their guilt, in this case, alcohol in their blood. To obtain a search warrant they need “probable cause” or reasonable grounds to believe a person was driving while impaired. The police will have very limited facts to support this reasonable belief for a warrant and the warrant may be more successfully challenged if the driver refuses to submit to any sobriety testing at the outset.Of course collecting blood with a warrant requires the police to employ medically approved methods to accomplish this. They don’t seek search warrants in every case, but the frequency of use of search warrants in DWIs, DUIs and DUIDs is on the rise. Short of physically refusing, an arrested driver should verbally politely refuse all sobriety testing. Period! This includes granting permission to take a blood sample. They should NEVER just submit thinking the police are going to get a warrant anyway.The more time that passes between arrest and collecting their sample, assuming the police are able to get a warrant at all, the less credible the results will be in court. Also, even with a warrant, most hospital emergency rooms will attempt to get an arrested driver to sign a “Release” or “Authorization for Treatment” before drawing blood. Nothing in the law says a driver must waive their right to sue for malpractice should they become infected by that needle, or waive their right to outright refuse medical treatment just because they’re under arrest. Most hospitals will not touch a conscious potential “patient” if they or a relative have not given them written permission to do so. How they'll respond when they have an officer with a warrant and a patient saying they don't want to be touched will likely vary greatly. The hospital employee may refuse to perform the procedure of drawing blood, opting to follow their procedures rather than the court's order. But the search cannot be challenged later in court if the driver just agrees to allow it.

  Other Things to Know

  Many people aren’t behind the wheel, but are merely in close proximity to a recently driven vehicle when they are arrested for DWI. The police must find a way to place that driver behind the wheel. They ask. And the driver tells them.Things a driver says to the police during an initial encounter can be used in court, and usually are with a great deal of officer’s elaboration. By the time it makes the arrest report a simple statement like “I’m changing a flat” will be recalled as “I was driving this car upon this public roadway a few minutes ago and had a blowout…” Again, a driver who has been drinking should say as little as possible, do as little as possible, and be as polite as possible. The jury will be watching! People arrested for DWI, DUI and DUID in the Fort Worth area need to retain an experienced criminal trial attorney immediately. Pleadings to preserve their driving privilege need to be filed within 15 days of their arrest.

• Otis Clark: If you have been accused of a crime, you need the services of an attorney who will fight to protect your rights and interests.
• Raymond Daniel: You only have 20 days from DWI arrest to hearing.
• Scott Brown: Alcohol Related Offenses – DWI (Driving While Intoxicated), DUI (Driving Under the Influence), Intoxication Assault, Intoxication Manslaughter

  Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) charges account for a large percentage of the criminal cases prosecuted in Texas. The penalties for a first time DWI offense are severe, including the possibility of: thousands of dollars in fines, up to six months in jail for your first offense, driver’s license suspension, and $1,000.00 per year for three years in order to avoid additional suspension of your driver’s license. Penalties increase for subsequent DWI charges; an arrest for a third or greater DWI can result in felony charges with the possibility of considerable prison time.

  The majority of people charged with DWI have never been in trouble before and are unfamiliar with the criminal justice system.

• Mullen & Whitaker: As you have probably guessed, most of the states witnesses in a DWI case are going to be police officers. These officers have testified time and time again in DWI trials. Effective cross-examination of these officers requires experience with DWI and the issues surrounding these particular cases (such as the field sobriety tests). But the good news is that when your attorney has this experience and knowledge, you almost always have a chance to win.
• Larry Dassow: The accused's first appearance after the indictment is called an arraignment. The first appearance in a misdemeanor case may also be called the arraignment. Unless formal arraignment is waived, the judge will verify the identity of the accused and ask for his plea. The judge may also appoint counsel at this time.
• Carol Kerr: If you have been arrested or charged with a crime, the importance of having legal representation cannot be overstated. While over zealous prosecutors are working hard to build their case against you, you deserve to have an experienced and aggressive attorney working just as hard to preserve and protect your constitutional rights.
• Leticia Vigil: DWI/DUI means "driving while intoxicated" or "driving while under the influence" and refers to the crime of drunk driving. This crime usually includes driving while abusing drugs and the operation of other kinds of motorized vehicles, such as boats. Drunk driving is defined by each state's criminal code.
• Bates Law Firm: Legal problems usually involve financial and emotional issues that can be a stressful, frustrating, and intimidating experience for non-lawyers. You need an experienced and skillful attorney to represent you throughout that process and to truly care about you and your particular legal problem.
• Canas & Flores: If you are convicted of drunk driving, you face fines and potential jail time. If your driving privileges are revoked or suspended, your ability to earn a living may be compromised. In order to obtain the best possible result, hire an attorney who knows how to handle DUI cases through experience and a successful track record.
• Greg Westfall: Getting a DWI is serious! You need to take it seriously. So should your lawyer. Even a conviction for a first-time DWI can carry serious consequences, not the least of which is $1,000 or more per year for three years just to keep your driver's license. If you are like the vast majority of those who get arrested for DWI, this is the ONLY way that you would ever have come into contact with the criminal justice system. Only because DWI laws exist do many people who would never dream of breaking the law find themselves arrested, photographed, fingerprinted, and generally 'treated like criminals.' This IS serious business. And once you have posted your bond, the whole process is really just beginning.
• Leigh Davis: A first DWI is a class B misdemeanor. The range of punishment is 3-180 days in the County Jail and fine of up to $2,000. A second DWI is a class A misdemeanor. The range of punishment is 3-365 days in the County Jail and fine of up to $4,000. The minimum punishment for a first or second DWI involving an open container of alcohol is six (6) days in the County Jail.
• Gary Medlin: In most states, it's illegal to drive a car while "impaired" by the effects of alcohol or drugs (including prescription drugs). This means that there must be enough alcohol or drugs in the driver's body to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. Many people reach this level well before they'd be considered "drunk" or "stoned."
• Mac Matson: Traffic violations can have serious criminal consequences, particularly when a driver is accused of driving under the influence. A conviction on DUI/DWI charges may result in fines, the revocation or suspension of your driver's license, and possible jail time. In addition, your insurance company may increase your rates to an unmanageable level. In defending against an impaired driving charge, you have many rights as a criminal defendant, including the right to cross-examine the witnesses against you, even if they are police officers. An experienced criminal defense attorney can make all the difference in such a difficult case.
• Evans, Gandy, Daniel & Moore: In defending against an impaired driving charge, you have many rights as a criminal defendant, including the right to cross-examine the witnesses against you, even if they are police officers. An experienced attorney with the skills and practical knowledge in these types of cases is best equipped to handle cross-examination and increase the odds of successfully defending the charges against you.
• Samantha Hill: DWI cases are unique in the criminal justice system and require skilled, experienced and knowledgeable counsel. A charge of DWI can have serious ramifications on a defendant's driver's license, criminal record and ability to function in society. The right attorney can make a difference.
• Mimi Coffey: The Intoxilyzer 5000 assumes that everyone has the same blood breath partition ratio, hematocrit ratio and assumes that all samples are at an air temperature of 93.2 F. Texas does not utilize any methods which would allow for a retest of samples given. The computer software is proprietary and is not available to scientific peer review. There are many things which have been shown to affect a breath test score. These machines are generally not available for inspections by anyone outside of law enforcement. Texas does not allow for non-law enforcement or government personnel to become certified as breath test technical operators. Much of the Texas breath program remains limited to outsiders despite a generally assumed belief that these machines have undergone and passed wide general scientific review.